Content
Area: Social Studies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade
Level: 6 |
|
|
|
Outcome 1
Outcome 2 |
|
|
|
|
Homework (goal = 4) |
Attendence (goal = 95%) |
Locate places and describe the
human and physical characteristic of those place using geographic tools (goal
= 7.0) |
Analyze interrelationships among
physical and human characteristics that shape the identify of places and the
development of civilizations (goal = 7.0) |
Analyze how and why humans modify
their natural environment (goal = 7.0) |
Describe the characteristics that
are used to organize people into cultures (goal = 7.0) |
Explain how cultural diffusion
influenced, such as trade, conflict, and migration (goal = 7.0) |
Analyze the practices and
beliefs of world religions and philosophies (goals = 7.0) |
|
|
Whole
Class |
3.2 |
87.7 |
7.3 |
5.7 |
5 |
6.1 |
5.4 |
5 |
|
|
LEP
students |
79.5 |
2 |
6.6 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
4.7 |
4.2 |
3.6 |
|
|
Non-LEP
students |
90.3 |
3.6 |
7.5 |
6.1 |
5.2 |
6.6 |
5.8 |
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
I think that my class was unsuccessful as a whole, although there were
students who did meet the goals. In fact, the class average was only at or
above the minimum level required for the goal for the first indicator. There
are a number of possible reasons for this problem. There are a number of
students with limited English proficiency in the class, who I studied in
depth as a subgroup. These students in general performed worse than the
students who were fluent in English. This is probably because social studies
involves a lot of reading, and if a student does not know English, it is very
hard to absorb the information. Also, there are many special needs students
in the class, who have physical and learning disabilities that are obstacles
to their learning. Finally, the large number of students who receive free and
reduced meals have a harder time performing than students who do not have to
worry about poverty. These are important issues that need to be addressed in
the classroom, and specialized instruction should be developed for them. All
of this negativity should not take away from students who performed well on
the tasks, including some students from disadvantaged subgroups. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
Homework is important to each indicator. In general, the students who had
high levels of homework completion did the best on the indicators. For
example, student #9 got a perfect 5 on his homework and received a beyond
satisfactory goal for each indicator. There are a number of reasons why
homework is related to achievement on the indicators. For one, homework is a
way for students to practice what they learned in class at home. If the only
do work in class, they will forget the key concepts. They need to have
additional practice outside of the classroom. Also, homework is a way to
continue learning beyond their classroom exercises. They might do a research
project which allows them to have a deeper understanding of the material.
Finally, the parents can get involved with homework, which is extremely
beneficial to the students. The LEP students as a whole recieved lower score
for homework than the rest of the class. This is probably because of poor
communication with parents. If the parents are not aware of the expectations
for the class, they cannot enforce the expectations on their children. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
Attendance is also important to the students’ success on each indicator.
Those students whose attendance approached 100% did much better on the
indicators than students who rarely attended class. The reasons for this are
obvious. If a student is in class, they are listening to the teacher conduct
direct instruction and participating in interactive activities to enrich
their understanding. Also, students who have good attendance are able to
interact with their peers more efficiently and learn from each other.
Students definitely benefit from group work and if a student is not in call,
he or she can not get a number of different perspectives from the group
members. LEP students also received lower marks in attendance. The reasons
for this are unclear, but may range from poor communication with parents to
frustration due to the language barrier. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|